4. DESCRIPTION OF TEST
Parameters offered for Comparison:
- fuel temperatures of several fuel rods at various elevations
- fuel cladding temperatures of several fuel rods at various elevations
- local fuel temperatures
- liner and shroud temperatures
- oxidation, UO2 and ZrO2 dissolution profiles
- hydrogen production rates
- axial distribution of relocated core materials
The exercise showed the existing capabilities of advanced codes for the prediction of the main degradation phenomena, although test-specific but unavoidable uncertainties existed
- predictions using specified conductivity function overestimated the rod temperatures by underestimating the heat losses through the shroud
- generally, results point on the needs for more verification and validation for severe fuel damage computer codes
- most important limitation concerned simultaneous UO2-ZrO2 dissolution by molten Zr and the relocation of molten materials
- specific features of testing degraded core conditions would require more code versatility to allow a correct analytical simulation of the experimental atypicalities (e.g., the shroud in case of the PHEBUS SFD test B9+)